Why Lily

A better ATS should change the numbers that matter.

Lily is not valuable because it automates more clicks. It is valuable because candidates move faster, recruiters recover time, agencies become less necessary and more vacancies turn into hires.

See the benefits first-hand
0.83
Days to screen, on average
Including evenings and weekends
3.9
Days from application to signed offer
Sonderwell case study
616 hrs
Recruitment admin saved monthly
Sonderwell case study
127%
More hires per month
Sonderwell case study
The difference

Old way vs Lily.

Screening new applicants
Waits for the next working day
The old way
With Lily
0.83 days average
Screened as they arrive
Application to signed offer
Weeks of back-and-forth
The old way
With Lily
3.9 days
Sonderwell case study
Cost per hire vs agency
£3,750–6,250
The old way
With Lily
£300
Per successful hire
Fast
Chapter one

Hire before the candidate disappears.

Every hour between application and first contact creates another chance for a candidate to accept a different role. Lily screens applicants as they arrive, including evenings and weekends, so good people move while their interest is high.

0.83 days average time to screen
53% of phone interviews completed outside working hours
3.9 days from application to signed offer
The speed numbers
0.83 days
Average time to screen an applicant
53%
Of phone interviews completed outside working hours
3.9 days
From application to signed offer
£
Chapter two

Replace agency and advertising spend.

Typical recruitment agencies charge £3,750 to £6,250 per hire. Lily Hire is £300 per successful hire, with distribution to thousands of job boards included and source-to-hire analytics that show which channels actually produce hires, not just clicks.

£300 per successful hire
Distribution to thousands of job boards included
Source-to-hire analytics: spend where hires come from
No subscription, no per-seat licence
Cost per hire on a £25,000 role
Recruitment agency (15%)£3,750
Recruitment agency (25%)£6,250
Lily Hire£300
Based on typical agency fees of 15–25% of first-year salary.
Every applicant screened

No CV pile triage. Every application is reviewed against the same role-specific framework, whether it arrives at 9am or 11pm.

Structured interviews

Conversational phone interviews and structured video interviews produce comparable, evidence-backed records, not gut feel.

Human review

Your team defines the process, reviews the evidence and makes the final decision. Every recommendation links back to what the candidate actually said and supplied.

Chapter three

Make decisions with better evidence.

Traditional high-volume recruitment forces a trade-off: review every candidate slowly, or move quickly with limited evidence. Lily removes the trade-off by screening everyone consistently and giving your team a clear record to decide from.

91%
Candidate satisfaction
2,464
Applicants processed
Chapter four

Give a small team enterprise capacity.

Recruiters should be building relationships and advising managers, not ringing unanswered numbers or chasing the same document for the fourth time. Lily automates the repetitive work, so smaller teams gain the operational capacity of much larger ones.

⏱
616 hrs
Recruitment admin saved monthly
✓
2,464
Applicants processed
↑
127%
More hires per month
★
91%
Candidate satisfaction

Sonderwell, a leading UK domiciliary care group, 12 months after implementing Lily.

Live

Want to hear what it's like to interview with Lily?

Have a real conversation with our AI. Lily will call you directly.

"Lily has transformed how we approach care recruitment. We're hiring more people, faster, with better compliance, and every candidate gets a proper experience. The ROI is exceptional."
Operations Director
Sonderwell, a leading UK domiciliary care group
Read the full customer story

An ATS is only efficient if the recruitment team has less work after buying it.

We'll show you exactly how Lily would work for your organisation: no hard sell, just a clear picture of what's possible.

Book a demo